A) Impact and Effect
In the 1930's Theodore Adorno had this theory called the
'Hypodermic Syringe', this is the idea that the media has a negative impact. In
Avatar there is an enormous amount of weapon use, the weapons are specifically
used by the humans when they show ignorance towards the lives of the Na'vi. And
though the film is very clearly fictional, Adorno's theory suggests that the
audiences could interpret this ignorance/ violence towards minorities as
acceptable as well as the use of guns and other weapons. Juxtaposed to this is
Dennis McQuail's theory (1972) which suggests people interpret media
differently and use it for different purposes e.g entertainment.
These theories demonstrate two different types of audiences,
active and passive. An active audience are people who discuss and question what
they see, this then prevents an audience from wrongly interpreting themes
within a film. A passive audience are people who copy what they see on screen,
this kind of audience of course supports Adorno's theory because it shows the
negative impact of media on an audience. In Avatar for example there is a (sort
of) sex scene between the protagonist (Jake) and Neytiri, the scene was even
removed from the original version of the film because of it's suggestive
content. If this was seen by a passive audience, it is likely that it would
encourage sexual behaviour and as Avatar is certified 12 by the BBFC it makes this
scene highly inappropriate.
A positive impact that Avatar might have is the way that the
Na'vi people are so connected with the environment. This might affect an active audience so they too begin appreciating nature and the environment, similarly the scene where Neytiri saves Jake but is insulted at the way Jake
disregards the life of the other animals.
B) Representation
Representation is the way that someone or something is
represented, Stuart Hall (1980) said that "all representations are
mediated", here Stuart Hall is saying that representations are created on purpose and this is how we get stereotypes.
Tessa Perkins (1979) declared that actually not all
stereotypes are negative, for example in Avatar the Na'vi are often likened to the stereotypical American Indian where they are a spiritual and athletic people. The film has also received criticism for it's portrayal of white males as rationalist and technocratic. David Brooks (A columnist for the New York Times) even accused the film of "resting on the assumption that non-whites need the white messiah". Perkins
also says that stereotyping, even when negative, comes from some element of
truth "Stereotyping is not a simple process and contains a number of
assumptions that can be challenged." For example, Earp and Katz (1999)
said '' the equation of masculinity with pathological control and violence'',
this is a negative stereotype about men but in Avatar the majority of the
marines are men and they seek money, control and violence so the media portrays
some truth to this.
So though the portrayal of men is certainly a negative
stereotype, Sigourney Weaver (as mentioned previously) portrays a strong
dominant woman, this is a countertype because it challenges typical stereotypes
about women being the 'damsel in distress. This is displayed in the scene where Grace knocks over the mug which Parker is using as a makeshift golf hole whilst passing a sarcastic ''Oops''. Here the character, Grace Augustine, is challenging her superiors which in turn challenges the 'damsel in distress' stereotype.
C) Legal and Ethical
The BBFC, or British Board of Film Classification, is the
primary organisation for film ratings and censorships in the UK. The BBFC
initially gave Avatar a 12A certificate; however this has changed multiple
times. The featurette 3D version of the film was certified on the 20th August
2009 as a 12A, but the 2D version was certified as a 12 on the 23rd February
the following year. Between September and October of 2010 all versions of the
film were certified as 12 which was most likely due to the introduction of the
'sex scene'. The film is rated PG-13 in America by the MPAA for all the same
reasons except their classification also includes ''some smoking'' which is not
seen as a problem in the UK.
The film keeps to these guidelines set
by the BBFC by using different shot types. There are various scenes (such as
when the antagonist kills Tsu'tey) which could have included more gore which
would have been more inappropriate for younger audiences but by cutting the
camera away from the scene it only gives the audience suggestions of violence rather
than the violence itself.
The soundtrack for Avatar was originally composed by James Horner, and though the soundtrack was filmed specifically for this film 20th Century Fox would have still needed to get permissions from James Horner's record label 'Atlantic Records' which itself is a subsidiary of 'Warner Music Group' as well as having permission from James Horner himself. This is very important because if 21st Century Fox did not seek permissions for the use of this soundtrack despite it being made specifically for this film they would still be classed as copyright infringement and therefore could be sued by the owners of the soundtrack.
The soundtrack for Avatar was originally composed by James Horner, and though the soundtrack was filmed specifically for this film 20th Century Fox would have still needed to get permissions from James Horner's record label 'Atlantic Records' which itself is a subsidiary of 'Warner Music Group' as well as having permission from James Horner himself. This is very important because if 21st Century Fox did not seek permissions for the use of this soundtrack despite it being made specifically for this film they would still be classed as copyright infringement and therefore could be sued by the owners of the soundtrack.

For the promotion of Avatar this poster was used (right),
the poster is very simple so it does not show any harm or widespread offence.
The poster displays some characters and the location so it is very clear
that this is a sci-fi or fantasy film, as well as not showing any reference to
pricing etc. this means that the film cannot be classed as misleading. Therefore, it would be appropriate to advertise towards a mass audience on billboards or the web in order to attract a mass mainstream audience, because the poster's content is not offensive.
And that is just about all you need to know about Avatar and
how ethical, legal and regulatory issues affect film. Thankyou, and as the
Na'vi would say "hayalovay", until next time.